Violation Of A Protective Order
Practice Area: Criminal Defense
Our client was charged with Penal Code Section 166(c)(1), violation of a protective order. After 6 weeks of negotiations our firm was able to get the charge dismissed.
Our legal team will always work hard to provide superior legal services for complex cases. Our San Jose criminal defense lawyers will work hard to ensure that you have the legal help you need, when you need it most. We will always deliver based on the highest standards of professional integrity and never back down from ensuring that our clients have the legal help they need.
A few of our firm’s impressive results are listed below. When you need help legal help, call 408-286-1351 or contact us online to schedule a free initial consultation.
Practice Area: Criminal Defense
Our client was charged with Penal Code Section 166(c)(1), violation of a protective order. After 6 weeks of negotiations our firm was able to get the charge dismissed.
Practice Area: Violent Crime
Our client was charged with Penal Code 594; Vandalism. On the eve of trial, we were able to get the case dismissed.
Practice Area: Criminal Defense
Our client was charged with Penal Code 602; Trespass to Land. After reading the police reports and witness statements it was clear that this case could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. We immediately set a date for trial and got the case dismissed.
Practice Area: Criminal Defense
Client charged with Health and Safety Code 11350(a); Possession of a Controlled Substance. We were able to get the case dismissed after 2 months of negotiations, highlighting the mitigating factors surrounding this specific instance.
Practice Area: Criminal Defense
Defendant was charged with Penal Code Section 273.5; Inflicting Corporal Injury on Specified Persons and Penal Code Section 166(c)(1), Violation of a Protective Order. After preliminary negotiations, we were able to get both charges dismissed.
Practice Area: Criminal Defense
Our client was charged with Penal Code 484; Theft. After an exhaustive investigation, it was clear that our client was the victim of identity theft. The court not only dismissed the case but found there to be a factual finding of innocence.
Practice Area: Criminal Defense
Our client was charged with Municipal Code 10.20.150; Trespass and Penal Code 148; Resisting a Peace Officer, after deliberations we were able to get both charges dismissed in the interest of justice.
Practice Area: Criminal Defense
Our client was charged with Penal Code Section 166(c)(1), violation of a protective order. On our first appearance, we were able to get the charge dismissed.
Practice Area: Criminal Defense
The Gordon Law Group took over representation of a client charged with trespassing, a criminal conviction would put their employment at risk and the associated fines and fees would be a significant burden. After evaluating the case our firm was able to reduce the charge to an infraction and have all fees and fines stayed.
Practice Area: Criminal Defense
Our firm represented a client charged with Penal Code Section 30305; Possession of Ammunition by Person Prohibited from Possessing or Owning a Firearm The defendant’s history made his exposure 8 years. After negotiations with the District Attorney reached an impasse, Samuel Gordon took the case to trial and was able to get all charges dismissed….